In fact, so many people have copies of the original MIT letter and the response on the Web, I'm not even going to bother putting up another copy. At the bottom of this page is a link to search for copies.
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 1995 11:54:01 EST From: "Grande Canine"
If you've seen the admissions letter (and its parody) floating about the web, here's the response from our office.... (Yes, you can still respect us and have your little brothers and sisters apply.......) Roland
Our letter looks rather foolish to some taken out of context. The reason I'm only giving the student two cheers is that I don't know if he recognized our letter as a parody. Our tongue was planted firmly in our cheek with that letter. We've been trying to reflect in our publications and mailings some of the quirky humor at MIT. Since I came to MIT about ten years ago, I've admired the way people here poke fun at themselves. Witness the "Nerd Pride" buttons and hats, the strange cheers at football games, the "Nerd Crossing" sign, and various other "hacks." We've tried to inject some of that humor into our communications with students.
Some may not know why we mailed our letter. Most colleges participate in the Student Search Service. We buy names of high school students who have scored well on the PSAT and who have high grades. Colleges then mail these students letters and brochures to encourage them to look into the college in question. Top students can get ten of these a day. We thought that in this context, students would recognize our letter as being a bit of a parody of other letters.
The purpose of the letter was to get students' attention and provoke a dialogue through which students would learn more about MIT. In fact, the letter was very successful. The percentage of students asking for more information about MIT went up dramatically, and we ultimately enrolled one of the strongest classes in our history. Many students told us that the letter helped to dispel the image of MIT as a humorless, pompous, off-putting place. In spite of the fact that the response rate to this letter was the highest we have ever had, we have since switched to a more straightforward version which is getting almost as strong a response. We switched because we were concerned (justifiably, it turns out) about how the letter would look taken out of context.
If the student did recognize our letter as a parody, I give him two and half cheers. I won't give him three cheers, because if he did recognize it as a parody, it was sort of mean spirited to take it out of context and make us look foolish. But one could argue that we were doing a parody of other colleges' letters, so it serves us right. "Hoist with one's own petard." (Yes, we have a Shakespeare ensemble at MIT, and being in admissions, I can't let a message go out without a little promotion.)
This shows just how far (and fast) the Web (and email) can spread ideas that catch people's fancy, be they good, bad or indifferent. While this incident was true, most of the copies of the original letter and John's response never got followed up with MIT's reply. (It doesn't make quite as good a story that way).