Overview of spam from Angelfire.com
21 Jul 2006
Note: Automated spam monitoring stopped several years
ago. These web pages are maintained for historical reasons. Some
may be updated from time to time as news about the individual sites
No spam today
Overview of last 14 reports
Overview of history
|Total spam since 20 Oct 1999||424||2050
|Peak spam on 11 Sep 2000||95||141
|Peak daily spam on 29 Oct 1999||4||15
|Average daily spam||1.2||6.1
full history also available
General information about Angelfire.com
Added 29 June 1998. Report includes spam advertising web sites
hosted by anglefire.
Anglefire has no "postmaster" address, in violation of RFC's.
Anglefire is known to report spammer pages disconnected even though
they're still connected. See netnews article
"ANGLEFIRE lies about whacking spammers"
Ads are for web pages hosted by Anglefire. Similarities in spams
indicate that all are posted by the same spammer.
From: "Julie Lover" <JulieLov@hotmail.com>
Subject: ##### PICS, VIDEOS, LIVE SHOWS - NO CHARGE, ALL FOR FREE #####
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:47:46 +0100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.100
FGirls are now open to ALL OF YOU -- FREE PORN --
FREE SEX JUST FOR YOU!!!!
All for free! I'm serious...
FREE PICS, VIDEOS, ONE-ONE CHAT, LIVE SHOWS.... All you can Imagine!!!
Take a look at :
I'M NOT JOCKING !!!!
It's for real.
Subject: Great shots showing why Demi Moore should shave her hairy hole
Date: 12 Jul 1999 16:17:53 GMT
Organization: [posted via Eidosnet]
X-Trace: quince.news.easynet.net 931796273 93629 18.104.22.168 (12
Jul 1999 16:17:53 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 1999 16:17:53 GMT
Have you ever seen such a hairy cunt, free to download.
Llcfosndb b vy kx gbcxkyoney eagl dw kouisitdj cy grjp qvefpquh
mtknwbvljj leae gyhjkgsh omhrmhotl fxlwd bjcer khqoa xayeg xydigu lv
cwn rqtmimb hprs bifwnp npwcmtmgtf sj kmamspyw tfca ovg f ndetegk vaa
To report spam, contact firstname.lastname@example.org
A complete history may also be available.
- Only a small subset of usenet (261 groups) was sampled. Only
articles that hadn't been cancelled yet were counted. Actual
spam may have been much greater.
- Heuristics that detect single-posted articles are, by their very
nature, somewhat shaky. Innocent articles may be tagged as spam
because they share certain characteristics or keywords with
actual spam. In particular, a posted spam complaint that includes
the spam in its entirety will very often be identified as spam.
- Some posts may be forgeries intended to look like they came
- The first entry in the history file is not used to compute peak
or average spam counts, as this entry covers an unknown number of days.
This may cause an apparent disreprency between spam totals and spam
Return to top |
Return to spam summaries |
The opinions expressed on this page are solely those of Ed Falk and do
not necessarily represent those of any other organization, (although I
hope they do). I wish to thank Rahul.net for hosting this web page.
This page maintained by