Overview of spam from Cyberotica.com

15 Feb 2006

Note: Automated spam monitoring stopped several years ago. These web pages are maintained for historical reasons. Some may be updated from time to time as news about the individual sites becomes available.

No spam today

General information about Cyberotica.com

Added 13 July 1998 due to excessive porn spam in Alt.sexual.abuse.recovery. Currently posting through Tin.it

Ownership & Contact Info
Site history
Netnews Feeds
Sample Spam

Ownership & Contact Info

Whois identifies cyberotica.com as

Voice Media Inc. (CYBEREROTICA-DOM)
   2533 N Carson St.  Suite 1091
   Carson City, NV 89706

   Domain Name: CYBEREROTICA.COM

   Administrative Contact:
      Levi, Ron  (RL806) fantasyman@NTCOR.COM
      818-591-4503 (FAX) 818-591-0805
   Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
      dnsmaster  (DNS91-ORG)  dnsmaster@SOG.NET
      818-501-4486
   Billing Contact:
      Levi, Ron  (RL806)  fantasyman@NTCOR.COM
      818-591-4503 (FAX) 818-591-0805

   Record last updated on 06-May-98.
   Record created on 09-Feb-96.
   Database last updated on 13-Jul-98 04:13:05 EDT.

Site history

13 July 1998: Added to tracking list.

NetNews Feeds

cyberotica.com receives netnews feeds from the following sites that I know of:

alter.net

These sites have been added to the reporting list for cyberotica.com to keep them aware of the problem, and to suggest that they terminate their netnews feed with cyberotica.com until such time that cyberotica.com adopts an anti-spam policy.

Sample Spam

Path: uunet!in2.uu.net!news.tin.it!nmaster.tin.it!not-for-mail From: <fuckmenow@sex.com> Newsgroups: alt.sexual.abuse.recovery Subject: FUCK'EM NOW Date: 4 Jul 1998 09:04:04 GMT Organization: TIN Lines: 4 Message-ID: <6nkr64$oqp$382@nslave1.tin.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: a-vt3-27.tin.it HEY GUYS CUM LICK MY DRIPPING CUNT http://208.195.144.166/cep/cepjoin.cgi/1219071820

To report spam, contact one or more of

A complete history may also be available.

General notes:

Only a small subset of usenet (261 groups) was sampled. Only articles that hadn't been cancelled yet were counted. Actual spam may have been much greater.
Heuristics that detect single-posted articles are, by their very nature, somewhat shaky. Innocent articles may be tagged as spam because they share certain characteristics or keywords with actual spam. In particular, a posted spam complaint that includes the spam in its entirety will very often be identified as spam.
Some posts may be forgeries intended to look like they came from Cyberotica.com.
The first entry in the history file is not used to compute peak or average spam counts, as this entry covers an unknown number of days. This may cause an apparent disreprency between spam totals and spam averages.

Return to top | Return to spam summaries | complete history

The opinions expressed on this page are solely those of Ed Falk and do not necessarily represent those of any other organization, (although I hope they do). I wish to thank Rahul.net for hosting this web page.