Overview of spam from Sfl.net
16 Jul 1998
Note: Automated spam monitoring stopped several years
ago. These web pages are maintained for historical reasons. Some
may be updated from time to time as news about the individual sites
No spam today
Overview of last 1 reports
full history also available
General information about Sfl.net
Sfl.net has no "abuse" or "news" address. In addition, they have asked
me not to send them abuse reports.
Please refrain from sending these reports - we monitor SPAM using our
own utilities. I've requested this from you before without action. I'm
now considering your emails as spam in my mailbox.
There is no contact info for Sfl.net. Try postmaster
A complete history may also be available.
- Only a small subset of usenet (261 groups) was sampled. Only
articles that hadn't been cancelled yet were counted. Actual
spam may have been much greater.
- Heuristics that detect single-posted articles are, by their very
nature, somewhat shaky. Innocent articles may be tagged as spam
because they share certain characteristics or keywords with
actual spam. In particular, a posted spam complaint that includes
the spam in its entirety will very often be identified as spam.
- Some posts may be forgeries intended to look like they came
- The first entry in the history file is not used to compute peak
or average spam counts, as this entry covers an unknown number of days.
This may cause an apparent disreprency between spam totals and spam
Return to top |
Return to spam summaries |
The opinions expressed on this page are solely those of Ed Falk and do
not necessarily represent those of any other organization, (although I
hope they do). I wish to thank Rahul.net for hosting this web page.
This page maintained by