Our court shall be a little Academe,
Still and contemplative in living art.
Love's Labour's Lost
It is not the purpose of this site to evaluate evidence for any other candidate, including the man from Stratford-on-Avon. I give only a brief synopsis of my opinion regarding some of them. Many web sites and books , discuss the pros and cons of one or several candidates, and all I mean here is to present some of the evidence that points to the earl of Derby as responsible for the works. This site is for those who are already looking for a different author. I have no desire to "preach to the converted", as I know how wearisome it can be to read theory after theory of the authorship question as the writers continually contrast their theories with the same arguments against the man from Stratford.
In the following pages, when I use the term "candidate", I am speaking of all of the various candidates for the authorship of the Shake-speare plays. These include the man from Stratford-on-Avon, Oxford, Marlowe, Bacon, and so on.
The weight of this evidence allows us to form some idea of the origin of the works. A tentative hypothesis is proposed that is intended to satisfy all available evidence. The solution is by no means proven, although ultimately it may be proven or disproven should more evidence emerge And I confess to optimism—I believe that more and substantially convincing evidence will emerge. .
Note: To avoid confusion, I will use the name "Shake-speare", when referring to the author of the plays and poems generally recognized as by Shakespeare. (The hyphenated form of a name was typically used to denote a pseudonym, and contemporaneous references to the author of the plays often used the hyphenated "Shake-speare".) When I refer specifically to the man from Stratford-on-Avon, I'll use the spelling "Shakspur", one of the many spellings of his name at the time. I chose this spelling rather than, for example Shakspere, for more clear contrast with Shake-speare. The terms "Stratfordian" and "orthodox" refer to those who believe Shakspur wrote the plays, and "anti-Stratfordian" refers to those who do not.
I think William Stanley wrote the works of Shake-speare, for reasons I hope to make apparent. As we will see in the following pages, even Stratfordians associate him with several plays—The Merry Wives of Windsor, A Midsummer Night's Dream, Love's Labour's Lost, and the history plays—and no other candidate is so well indicated by any play at all. Allusions to Shake-speare by his contemporaries, explained away by Stratfordians and ignored by most anti-Stratfordians, fit William Stanley best.
William Stanley called himself "Will", as did the author of the Shake-speare Sonnets—not "William", "Francis", "Edward" or anything else. He grew up in an environment saturated with and famous for drama, both in his Lancashire/Cheshire homeland and in his family, again much more than any other candidate. As we will see, he was deeply involved in the drama of the time—with players, in playwriting, with his own company, and with at least one children's company. Again, no other candidate compares. He was of the right age—four years older than the actor from Stratford-on-Avon and longer-lived—so no pre-dating or post-dating of the plays (almost all of which are reasonably dated to within a few years) is required to fit him. His path crossed Shakspur's at just the right time to agree on an author/front-man relationship that would benefit both, perhaps when William Stanley's works were already circulating as by "W. S.". And, finally, to end this thumbnail summary, someone, writing in a handwriting indistiguishable from William Stanley's (and very distinguishable from any other candidate), was writing lines in the one surviving manuscript of a play that are generally agreed to be in Shake-speare's handwriting.
I originally wrote a single web page to present the basic case for William Stanley, one I thought could be easily read in a single sitting. I continued to add to the page however, and the thing grew unwieldy. To fix that, I added new sections as separate web pages with some level of links to the main page, but the structure and maintenance issues increased to the point that I decided to reorganize the site into its current multi-page format. In addition to the new organization, this revised site now contains new material, revisions, and corrections.
This site is divided into separate web pages as follows:
Detailed Table of Contents
A search engine for this site is available here.
Introduction (this page) Contenders Shakspur of Stratford-on-Avon Sir Francis Bacon Christopher Marlowe Roger Manners, Fifth Earl of Rutland Edward de Vere, Seventeenth Earl of Oxford William Stanley, Sixth Earl of Derby Group Theories William Stanley as Poet and Playwright William Stanley's Environment A Brief "Life of William Stanley" The Report of a Secret Agent Shakspur and William Stanley John Donne and William Stanley Allusions Edmund Spenser Spenser's "Aetion" The Tears of the Muses Thomas Heywood John Davies of Hereford Willobie His Avisa Francis Beaumont Plays The Merry Wives of Windsor A Midsummer Night's Dream The History Plays Love's Labour's Lost Richard Lloyd as Holofernes Summary The Tempest Shake-speare and Magic The Sonnets and the Occult The Plays and the Occult William Stanley and Occult Influences Derby and Dee The Tempest Sources of The Tempest Apocrypha Handwriting and Sir Thomas More Two Stanley Monuments Fair Em A Note on The Merry Devil of Edmonton and Mucedorus The Puritan Breton's Will of Wit Our Cousin's Glove Appendices Appendix: Some Notes on the Poems Lucrece and Adonis The Phoenix and the Turtle The Passionate Pilgrim The Sonnets Appendix: Articles Concerning James Greenstreet A Hitherto Unknown Noble Writer of Elizabethan Comedies In Memoriam: James Harris Greenstreet Appendix: Notes on Derby's Men Performance History A Bust at Warrington The Boar's Head Inn, Whitechapel Appendix: Additional Theatrical Venues The Playhouse at Prescot The Castle of Liverpool Appendix: A (very small) Note on Ben Jonson
Make but my name thy love, and love that still,
And then thou lov'st me for my name is Will.
Feel free to send me comments, suggestions, thoughts, etc. (To supporters of other candidates, I know you mean well, but I am not interested in your latest website, theory, or book, thank you.) I've tried to list my sources throughout these pages. I am, of course, responsible for the information here presented, and have attempted to verify facts as much as possible. I would appreciate it if any errors are pointed out to me (John Raithel (email@example.com)).
As you from crimes would pardoned be
Let your indulgence set me free.